On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 08:22:00AM +0000, Jon Kyme wrote:
A somewhat related document is draft-malamud-no-soliciting-02, found at:
http://trusted.resource.org/no-solicit/
The problem I have with the various NO-SOLICIT / NO-UCE proposals that have
been made over the years is that they seem to imply that a system /
recipient accepts UCE / solicitations *by* *default* unless it gives the
sender notice. And that a sender will assume it's doing nothing "wrong" if
it isn't given any such notice. It strikes me that this is completely
contrary to the direction of this group (and the law in many
jurisdictions). A recipient does not give implicit consent to any
communication by not expressly denying it, any more that I accept that you
can shoot me because I don't wear a T-shirt saying "No-Shooting".
Hmm, that's exactly the point I made when Eric first submitted his
draft back on November 14. Thus I agree :-)
-mm-
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg