ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

[Asrg] Re: 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard

2004-01-28 09:03:11
In <200401280654(_dot_)i0S6sQs4028275(_at_)bulk(_dot_)resource(_dot_)org> Carl 
Malamud <carl(_at_)media(_dot_)org> writes:

I've tried hard to keep this draft very focused on a simple mechanism
that allows a sender or an mta to assert keywords, a receiver to
assert keywords, and a registry to keep track of keywords.

I confess that I haven't read the draft *real* closely, but can't a
spammer just avoid seeing the "no solicitations" sign by using HELO
instead of EHLO?


-wayne


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>