mathew wrote:
On Mar 20, 2004, at 13:48, Doug Royer wrote:
mathew wrote:
On Mar 19, 2004, at 14:10, Doug Royer wrote:
A popular vendor broke their implementation of S/MIME, that was
fixed years
ago and a simple upgrade will fix that.
Well, your message signature doesn't seem valid to my mail program.
Again, your vendor being busted does not mean that S/MIME is busted.
No, but it's a good indication that S/MIME isn't ready for prime time
when the three different S/MIME packages available to me can't talk to
each other.
I can name 4 popular ones that can interoperate with each other. So it
looks ready to me.
--
Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug(_at_)Royer(_dot_)com | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574
| Cell: (208)520-4044
We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature