Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - FTC approves label for sexually-explicit spam
2004-04-15 07:53:31
I can guess the answer, but does anyone have any statistics showing
spammers actually beginning to comply with the CAN-SPAM act?
mathew -- <URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - FTC approves label for sexually-explicit spam, John Levine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Asrg] Usefulness of wholesale blocking of attachments for SMTP?, mathew |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - FTC approves label for sexually-explicit spam, John Levine |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - FTC approves label for sexually-explicit spam, JC Dill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |