"Michael Kaplan" <mkaplansolution(_at_)lycos(_dot_)com> wrote:
There will still be some innocent victims, but the number is now far
fewer.
"None" is acceptable. Any number higher than that, even if "far
fewer" than some even worse method, is not acceptable.
If I'm a victim of your system, there will be complaints and blocking
as a result.
Email service providers can respond to the growing popularity of
this system by filtering out any bounce that is sent to a user who
had not previously sent the corresponding email. There really
should be no reason for anyone to receive a bounce in response to an
email that they never sent."
As you can see instant global implementation of my system is
definitely not a requirement.
No, it's merely a requirement not to be subjected to spam by the users
of your system.
No, I haven't received much in terms of words of support, but I've
avoided what I feared most: A specific reason(s) why my system
wouldn't work.
Which you did by ignoring the reasons given.
My system remains the ONLY proposed system that allows people avoid
nearly 100% of spam while retaining their current email address,
while allowing strangers to correspond, while being very simple to
use and to implement, while remaining impervious to any technical
circumvention by spammers.
I note that you don't give as a goal "avoiding harm to innocent
victims". That's one reason the users of your system will find
themselves blocked.
Seth
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg