If they are moving over port 25, its smtp traffic by design. Is is safe to
classify this traffic as "spam" by its nature?
-M
---
Martin Hannigan
hannigan(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com
Verisign, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gadi Evron <ge(_at_)linuxbox(_dot_)org>
To: Hannigan, Martin <hannigan(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com>
CC: asrg(_at_)johnlevine(_dot_)com <asrg(_at_)johnlevine(_dot_)com>;
asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Fri Dec 31 07:59:48 2004
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
So what are we saying? Systemic destruction of spam is not necessary?
No. It simply says that spam is not the biggest bandwidth bogger - by
itself. With viruses and spyware I'd put money on it.
Gadi.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg