Yes. Based on how bit traffic is moved regardless of who moves it, once it's
off the backbone, its a loss leader, right in front of nntp.
-M
---
Martin Hannigan
hannigan(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com
Verisign, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: asrg-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <asrg-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
To: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Fri Dec 31 07:37:10 2004
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics
Gadi Evron <ge(_at_)linuxbox(_dot_)org> wrote:
It is obvious HTTP would win, and P2P would be a good rival, but
email is not far behind. Statistics change between different service
providers, but when you need 30% more bandwidth because of spam,
it's still a cost.
Thing is, who makes money from these 30% being provided? Answer is,
everyone but the lowest in the chain of consumers.
Only if the costs are passed on down. If they can't be (which seems
to be the case now) then whoever eats them loses. That's more likely
to be the ISPs.
Seth
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg