"Michael Kaplan" <mkaplansolution(_at_)lycos(_dot_)com> wrote:
Opinion: A system that causes any number of innocent people to
receive an erroneous bounce is unacceptable.
Response: My system may (warning: arbitrary guess coming) prevent
500 pieces of spam from reaching inboxes for every one erroneous
bounce that arrives in an inbox. I could live with this. If your
provider had updated your system then you will never get an
erroneous bounce.
If your system prevents 500 pieces of spam from reaching _you_ at the
cost of one more piece of spam reaching _me_ then I find it
unacceptable. I don't care what the ratio is; I'm not willing to get
more spam so that you get less.
Seth
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg