In article <4391D6B3(_dot_)5DB6(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> you write:
william(at)elan.net wrote:
under consideration for publication:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-01.txt
It's only under consideration to the extent that any other independent
submission
is, that is, not much.
Executive summary: DNSBLs do not block 100% of spam and SORBS has a few false
positives, therefore all DNSBLs are bad.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg