On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On 3 Dec 2005, John Levine wrote:
In article <4391D6B3(_dot_)5DB6(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> you write:
william(at)elan.net wrote:
under consideration for publication:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-01.txt
It's only under consideration to the extent that any other independent
submission
is, that is, not much.
Is there an official place to register adverse comments? I took a look at
the IETF web site, and couldn't find one.
That is what last call is for - which does not usually happen for informational
drafts - these are just decided by IESG & RFC-Editor directly, What you can
do is post your comment to general ietf list (i.e. ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org) and CC that
email post to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org and to rfc-editor(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org(_dot_) You need to
emphasize that draft publication could be harmful to internet engineering
practices and conclusions made are overgeneralized and not entirely logical.
Also draft has some format problems for example it has only one References
section (and new rules require separate Informative and Normative reference
sections) and none of the sections are numbered (although that may not be
required for if there is no TOC is there and TOC is not required for
drafts of less then 15 pages - still unnumbered sections is unusual).
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg