RFC0, aka "Use Common Sense".
Don't leave to outsiders to figure out when you f*ck up inside.
I would say it could be a fair use case, *if* MAIL_From, Errors-To:
etc are set properly, i.e. to an internal address where people fix
internal mail problems. Then you could keep From:, making Support's
MUA sending responses back to the custommer.
Gunnar Lindberg
On 3/16/06, Bill Cole <asrg2(_at_)billmail(_dot_)scconsult(_dot_)com> wrote:
At 8:41 AM -0800 3/16/06, ajv-oarybolive(_at_)vsta(_dot_)org wrote:
---------------
Hi,
I just attempted to put in a work request for my Sirius radio
subscription,
via their web site. Whaddya know, I got an E-mail bounce back from them.
Turns out that Sirius uses electric.net behind the scenes, and your web
submission turns into an E-mail submission with a From: which is filled
in
to look like a request from your own E-mail address.
A bad practice. One that is extremely common, but which has always
been lazy and unwise, even before SPF and even before spam was a
significant problem.
Which RFC does it violate though? I think it's a fair use case.
-M<
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg