-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John R Levine wrote:
This document has been submitted to the RFC editor for possible
publication. They have asked for the ASRG to comment on it. Comments
could include how accurate it is, changes that would be needed before
publishing it, etc.
There's a number of logical inconsistencies, false conclusions, and even
just plain wrong arithmetic. The sample set is grossly too small etc
etc. etc.
I can feed someone remarks, but I don't have the time to write up a
formal document.
[Tho, there's a remote possibility I can get someone off-list to put
pieces together - and write some of his own. I'll check tomorrow.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRCiwtp3FmCyJjHfhAQJvuwP/RK+vXXxwHzjf3lKSu8s3AAx9RfSWFGRe
FSTTZxR0jmK7YbYCeP9+FcVdxpYvcc8YYRkJqvNJH6yJ3a4FAWBKxqtazEKMdr0n
jF/hcUzclAf0/UCx0F79YKziAErtFLYMPVmwEgs1ZcMYuNaiJ8v3HLGNe9Qklne+
0JUtwTwXzdA=
=D698
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg