-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jim MacLeod wrote:
3) The statistical sample presented is small, and the analysis lacks
rigor.
We plan on presenting a statistical sample over 400 times larger that
shows more realistic numbers. Eg: .01% FPs on CBL, 0 on SBL.
If our numbers were as lousy as his, we'd not use DNSBLs either.
Hand-managed content filters achieving 97% effectiveness? That can
hardly be realizeable in a community of any appreciable size.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRCoZop3FmCyJjHfhAQLfuwQAzrkcSgWzruDlYEsrUV/RgzpMUvVSw6Px
PfcW7lytEb4/y7GQWQXuXGVOE4MFlvyJHLeToz44ZTcNEwAO1TS24jXDelNT3gRa
Fmd9pOAc5a7ByR+TH8gRFp1tetTzG8RcZjKXNr/uiBA+a/0V3PxQ5mZ1OKKIoqly
8prSr9kpNQ0=
=xxIB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg