On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, John L wrote:
Sigh. When I first saw it it seemed to me to be yet another idiot
complaining about being blacklisted by an over-aggressive blacklist,
and blaming all blacklists rather than foolish MTA operators who use
them inappropriately.
That was my impression, too, but the IETF has processes and if someone asks
them to consider a draft, the need some basis to blow him off.
The draft was submitted directly to RFC-Editor. So did this request come
from IETF (i.e. RFC-Editor asked IETF and IETF then asked ASRG) or directly
from RFC-Editor? Note also that it being sent to RFC-Editor means its not
IETF that is final judge based on the comments from ASRG but RFC-Editor
(which generally has responsibility to publish where as IETF often prefers
to "blow off" when its indendent submission)
BTW - I seem to remember bringing this draft for discussion here a few months
ago...
---
William Leibzon
mailto: william(_at_)completewhois(_dot_)com
Anti-Spam and Email Security Research Worksite:
http://www.elan.net/~william/emailsecurity/
Whois & DNS Network Investigation Tools:
http://www.completewhois.com
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg