ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Comments on draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-01.txt

2006-03-27 22:56:01
Is an appropriate response: "This is such a poorly thought-out,
inaccurate and shoddy piece of work that the ASRG doesn't wish to waste
any further time with it."?  Or does the ASRG need to spell out why it's
sooo baaaadd?

The latter.  The IETF's understanding of spam issues is not strong and
as I found at last week's meeting, there's a lot of poorly informed
sympathy for the "all DNSBLs are bad" argument.


PS:  How in the world did it get from -00 to -01?

All that means is that the author sent in a new draft.  Anyone can
send in a draft, if it meets the mechanical criteria, they'll publish
it as a draft.

R's,
John


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>