On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:34:20PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote
"John R Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> wrote:
This document has been submitted to the RFC editor for possible
publication. They have asked for the ASRG to comment on it.
Sigh. When I first saw it it seemed to me to be yet another idiot
complaining about being blacklisted by an over-aggressive blacklist,
and blaming all blacklists rather than foolish MTA operators who use
them inappropriately. It was so obviously biased and ill-informed that
I thought it would be given all the attention ite deserves, i.e. none.
Sigh.
I think that a reply of some sort is *ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY*. It's a
bad idea in so many ways it's not even funny. Is some vote necessary,
or will it be "accepted by default" if everybody else is too busy rolling
around on the floor, laughing, to refute it?
Getting back to Church's draft-01, I'm an end user with a personal
domain. During the past 2 weeks, my remote ISP's end-user-configurable
SMTP-stage filters have rejected 3472 email delivery attempts. I feel
just as (un)qualified as Mr. Church to submit comments. If nobody else
else will volunteer, I will. Even if someone else takes the lead, I'm
willing to help out.
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes(_at_)waltdnes(_dot_)org> In linux /sbin/init is Job #1
My musings on technology and security at http://tech_sec.blog.ca
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg