For your case "unknown stranger" the default is that you just have no
clue who the sender is.
If I might be forgiven a slight nitpick, you actually have a 20% chance
of knowing who the sender is (assuming an 80% spam figure).
I call this a nitpick because while it is definitely better than having
"no clue", it is not good enough to be useful in a practical sense.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML
mouse(_at_)rodents(_dot_)montreal(_dot_)qc(_dot_)ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg