-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan Oetting wrote:
On Jan 27, 2007, at 6:43 PM, gep2(_at_)terabites(_dot_)com wrote:
Here is my proposal. I'm sure I haven't thought of everything so
please tell me where it breaks or how spammers are going to game it.
The goal is to stop the majority of the spam while not loosing ANY
legitimate email (broken MTAs don't count).
To begin with, crude IP blocks will ALWAYS lose legitimate mail,
because a single IP address can send both legitimate and
zombie-generated mail. I propose that NO ISP-based software will be
capable of differentiating one from the other... but the recipient
possibly will know how to do that, at least for familiar senders.
I guess I didn't think to include a definition for "Lost Email".
Lost Email is any email that is sent but not presented to the user and
does not generate a DSN to the sender. When referring to a receiving
system loosing email it is assumed that the sending system is following
standard procedures.
By that definition, our filters NEVER EVER lose an email.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRb4Oq53FmCyJjHfhAQJFAwP+PCnqCM4iOnEPWmh3VoH1hRQw5Mmd2RBV
zk4nCPgATRVK3G6AFu4pIOM+wN/MouGGZrSlq2sk8opl7dk7wQ7FzNxJB9vfA6V/
F11XcAKwBVW0BKmmUKaj49bn7jwVE42rTHdex6eg5DabhGINh9W7L1to2iim9PvD
1xAYjWLHLn8=
=a0KE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg