On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org>
wrote:
Some BL policies do not adhere to the dubious philosophy expressed in
section 2.2.1 and 2.2.3.
Could you elaborate upon the relevancy of that fact? I'm not seeing
why it matters.
2.2.1. Listings SHOULD Be Temporary
2.2.3. Removals SHOULD Be Prompt
Automatic de-listing can be highly counter productive in controlling
IP address ranges previously producing substantial levels of abuse.
Requiring owners of an address range to request de-listing establishes
points of contact to better deal with likely events of future abuse.
I think these should stand as is. I think they cover "it's not
suitable to remove your IP address at this time" eventualities just
fine.
Regards,
Al Iverson
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg