On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Matt Sergeant
<msergeant(_at_)messagelabs(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 29-Mar-08, at 5:46 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>> So, RBL(tm) listings get listed until the problem is fixed, and the
>> responsible party contacts the blacklisting provider.
>
> If this is the criterion, all you have to do to conform to 2.2.1 is
> check your mailbox every 6 months. If nobody has reported that the
> problem is fixed, the criterion still applies and you can extend the
> listing for another 6 months. (of course the BCP contains other
> recommendations, too)
Thank you - that's exactly what I was thinking.
Doug: does this make sense to you? This is in full compliance.
This seems like full compliance to me, as well.
Al
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg