ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

[Asrg] Whack-a-mole (was Re: The fundamental misconception about paying for mail)

2008-11-30 13:33:25
On Nov 30, 12:49pm, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
} 
} I do mean that.  The point I'm trying to make (and may not be making
} very well) is that there's no way for an external entity, like a server,
} to programatically tell the difference between (a) a real/non-spam
} message sent by the former owner of a zombie and (b) a spam message sent
} by the new owner of the zombie.

The external entity needs to diferentiate to block all the spam from
the zombie, but it doesn't need to differentiate to report that a
message (any message) was sent using that former owner's identity.

There already exist systems like DCC that collect statistics on large
numbers of email messages at recipient servers and report back.  If
the feedback loop could be completed back to the former owner via some
external channel, in the way that a monthly statement from the phone
company lists all the telephone numbers one has called, the former
owner might have a chance to de-zombie his system.

Yes, it's whack-a-mole, but at the moment we seem to have a whole lot
of moles and no one whacking.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>