Seth wrote:
Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
<Jose-Marcio(_dot_)Martins(_at_)mines-paristech(_dot_)fr>
wrote:
You're right when you say that sometimes some people may want to use
internet as a private network. But this is contrary to internet
philosophy.
Hmmmmm.....
No, it isn't. The Internet philosophy is "we ship bits around.
That's what spammers do...
Interpretation is someone else's problem."
and this is what usual spam filters do.
In your idea, the problem is pushed into recipients. Consent pushes the problem
to the sender.
Either way, I don't think we can agree.
VPNs aren't against that philosophy, they're embraced by it.
Ther's a big difference between VPNs and consent.
VPNs are really private - information about VPNs instances (IP address of entry points,
protocol, flavour, ...) aren't public and aren't available to unknown users.
Consent users information is public : Claudio Telmon email address is public and known by
everybody.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr
Ecole des Mines de Paris
60, bd Saint Michel 75272 - PARIS CEDEX 06
mailto:Jose-Marcio(_dot_)Martins(_at_)mines-paristech(_dot_)fr
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg