--On 8 February 2010 20:56:23 +0000 Andrew Richards
<ar-asrg(_at_)acrconsulting(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
That creates a massive barrier to adoption. Huge implementation
overhead.
However TiS is implemented will require implementation work on the server-
side, so I'm not sure that [2] is so different from [1] in this respect.
Well, the one huge difference is that an SMTP report [1] might be sent
anywhere, and the mailstore operator may never see them.
A mailstore report [2] can only be sent to the mailstore operator - it's
then the business of the operator to aggregate and act upon those reports,
perhaps by forwarding some of them elsewhere.
So, one question that requires answering is "who's ultimately in control
here: the operator or the user?"
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg