On 1/19/2011 10:52 AM, David Nicol wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Chris Lewis<clewis(_at_)nortel(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Imagine if you will restaurant reviewers charging restaurants for a
re-review of bad vouches. Just how well do you think that would be
received by _anyone_? Even more so with DNSBLs.
Restaurant reviewing is luxury, not infrastructure. Revise to "health
departments" and it seems entirely reasonable.
Health inspections are a regulatory/legal requirement - compliance is
legally mandatory, and if there are fines, that's also part of the
legislative framework. Not to mention that there's usually only one you
have to deal with. It's part of the implicit (or explicit) societal
contract that a restaurant undertakes to comply with by existing.
That's a huge qualitative difference between that and some random
self-selected guy showing up at the cash register who says "your bacon
was horrible, pay me money or I'll shut you down". Those guys usually
carry baseball bats.
Is "Pollyanna" your middle name?
I'm Canadian. Does that answer your question? ;-)
I for one eagerly await the Canadian invasion, with their quaint paper
ballots. I shall throw flowers from my balcony.
We aim to please ;-)
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg