ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Rough consensus on pay to delist

2011-03-04 10:27:47
-----Original Message-----
From: asrg-bounces(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:asrg-bounces(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John Levine
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 5:27 PM
To: asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Rough consensus on pay to delist

I disagree here and note that legislators may look to this BCP later
if they intended to write such legislation.

Having helped some actual legislators write actual legislation, I
find it utterly implausible that anyone would ever legislate the
practices of DNSBLs in other than the most general terms.

Note that in the US they're protected by 47 US 230 which says they can
do anything they want so long as there's a plausible good faith basis
for doing so.  Case law confirms that making mistakes does not mean
you weren't acting in good faith.

Feel free to point me at some reading materials to answer this question, but:

Isn't that statement contradictory to what happened to MAPS?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg