On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:39:41 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
Who knows? I mean, if mail eventually needs to be
signed before it's accepted by the masses, they may
well be forced to sign -- or find some other transport
vehicle.
I think that the history of adoption of SPF by spammers demonstrates nicely
that
the mere act of associating a confirmable identity is not enough. So the mere
act of signing should not be a criterion for acceptance of the mail.
The required additional step is some basis for assessing that identity.
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org