Michael Thomas wrote:
The other part of this that I admit to being confused by is in what
capacity Stephen is speaking -- bof chair, or just a contributor like
any of the rest of us. The charter Barry sent out was discussed at
length on the list and didn't seem especially contentious either on
the list or at the Paris bof -- the main contention was the lack of a
threats draft. Nor do I recall any pushback about the charter from
our AD's (?). So I'm not sure what a wholesale rewrite at this point
is actually attempting to accomplish. Are we really at risk of going
off into the weeds at this point if we don't revisit every point of
consensus we've accomplished in the last year or so?
My impression is that the charter was not well accepted in Paris.
Either way though, I have pointed out specific problems that I see
with it, some directly motivated by listening in Paris, and I've
suggested some new text for discussion.
In my role as Bof co-chair, I would not recommend the aug 22 draft
if those items don't get addressed.
The particular text I suggested however, is, as I've said,
just offered for consideration and we'll end up wherever the
consensus take us. So that's done as a conributer.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org