There was a great deal of contention regarding what DKIM was
attempting to achieve at the Paris BOF.
there was? there was a great deal of contention about how to run the
meeting, but serious debate about the 'purpose' of debate -- enough
debate to justify your assessment -- was entirely lacking, from my own
memory of it.
Nor does the current charter reduce this confusion. There are aspects
within this charter that remain misleading, such as suggesting the
mechanism is to solve header forgery.
All documents can be improved. What is significant, here, is that the
previous charter went through extensive review and revision.
It therefore make sense to consider charter text in terms of surgical
revisions. You want to suggest specific text changes, that's fine. But
it cannot possibly be productive to have (yet another) sequence of
wandering through the weeds of general charter criticism.
We achieved quite-good rough consensus on the previous text. Let's try
not to lose it.
d/
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org