Barry Leiba wrote:
Does this reflect what most of us think?
You have something like draft-kucherawy in the "once the
primary goals are met" section, that's fine. What about
draft-dkim-pkix-00 ? I'm only asking, I can't judge it.
Does it adequately explain what we're trying to do, and
not trying to do?
It does allow to find a decent new FWS canonicalization,
doesn't it ? Maybe add one month to "signature" for it,
and substract one month from the DNS RR.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org