Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: dkim service2005-10-13 12:30:23Dave Crocker wrote: a derivative bit that emerged from this was the counter-intuitive possibility that a mailing list capable of doing dkim signing could choose not to, for a message that is already signed. that is, it could knowingly preserve the existing signature. Counterintuitive? Hmm. Wasn't it Ernie Kovaks' schtick: "''doctor it hurts when I do this'' ''so don't do that''" Mike _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
|
|