Douglas Otis wrote:
On Oct 13, 2005, at 4:20 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
This relates to one of the motivations for multiple signatures. If
you have a non-mangling mailing list, you might want to preserve the
original signature, because it's still valid and some people might
want to base a decision on that. They (or others) might want to know
for sure that it came from the list, because they want to make sure
that they read all messages on the list. A WG chair might have that
concern, for example.
Agreed, but how would you ensure the sequence of the keys?
I don't understand the need for sequencing at all. If
a signature binds to an address you care about, that's
goodness. If multiple do, I'm not sure that it makes
any difference to the receiver because it's coming from
the same "authority" (ie, the domain).
Mike
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org