Stephen Farrell wrote:
There's clearly confusion/disagreement on multi-signature
semantics, and I can see why.
While this is something that has to be cleared up, I hope
I'm right in saying that its not so fundamental as to be
a show-stopper in terms of getting a wg off the ground.
For now, isn't it probably ok to add this to the to-do
list and continue to work on the threat analysis which
was a show-stopper last time?
Works for me. I think we have established that this is an interesting
area for the WG to consider.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org