Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: what is DKIM for, was on multi-signatures

John Levine wrote:
> This disagreement about multiple signatures cuts to the heart of what
> DKIM is for.  If, as Mike Thomas seemed to be saying, the most we can
                                                            ^^^^
> get from DKIM is another factor to toss into the spamassassin hopper,
> we're wasting our time. 
I said at the *least*.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org