Doug,
Douglas Otis wrote:
On Nov 16, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
A claim made in the charter of detecting spoofing depends upon a
comparison of the signing-domain with the email-address domain.
There is no such absolute claim that I can see in the draft
charter [1].
The charter still offers justification for pursuing constraints on the
email-address. That aspect should be removed from the charter and
deferred to permit broader consensus independent of the DKIM effort.
In the meantime, the base DKIM can developed and deployed.
I disagree. I see ohers disgreeing with you. I don't see
anyone else agreeing with you even though there've been
many, many opportunities.
In IETF terms we have a good consensus against your opinion.
So you should accept that and move on to the next thing. Ok?
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org