Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance

On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 02:11 -0500, Hector Santos wrote:

This is logic that software can use. It doesn't have to sign the From: under
special situations.


It is not a matter of protected headers, it is a matter of policy.

-Doug

_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Jeff Macdonald Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, SM Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Douglas Otis <= Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, John Levine [ietf-dkim] multi-From (was: SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance), Frank Ellermann Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP security relies upon the visual domain appearance, Michael Thomas