Patrick Peterson <ppeterson(_at_)ironport(_dot_)com> wrote:
Let's hammer out the technical specifications, make them the best they
can be and get this thing to market. Let's not discuss whether the
charter should allow divergence from DNS, let's discuss the best
solution and if DNS can be proven the wrong way to go, I'll gladly argue
for this change. Let's be technologists, not philosophers.
But the problem is that the currently proposed charter, would, IMO,
preclude the adoption of something that was a better way to go if it
couldn't be demonstrated that that change was necessary for the success
of DKIM. That's why discussing that charter language is prior
the discussion of specific technical changes.
-Ekr
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org