John Levine wrote:
Our lives would be simpler if everyone would mail only in
ways that matched our favorite simple security model
Sure, but where some practice is far beyond anything found
in an RfC it's okay to say "broken".
disparaging real mail sent in inconvenient ways as "forging"
isn't going to make that happen.
Foul-ups in what I consider as "user territory" like the body
(content), Message-ID, From, Sender, Reply-To, Subject, Date,
and any Resent-zoo are a bit more than only "inconvenient".
I'd have no problem with s/forgery/broken/, but "inconvenient"
is way too weak.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org