Re: [ietf-dkim] WEAK (was: DKIM and mailing lists)

On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 20:41 -0500, Hector Santos wrote:
> So to me, we need to go strong with DKIM/SSP and be very careful about
> the relaxation of the protocol.  Either you support it or your don't.
> No in-between.
Do you mean only closed policies should be published with DKIM?

Do you mean some policy should be published?

What benefit for the sender is there publishing a default open-ended
policy?


-Doug

_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org