Barry Leiba wrote:
Dave brought up, at the Monday DKIM IETF session, the idea of splitting
out the key-discovery parts from the base document. I've recently come
up with a need to have the canonicalization be separately referenced.
I'm throwing this out to the mailing list for discussion:
Good idea to resolve this now.
The only thing I'd add is to ask folks to also bear in mind
our charter [1] deadlines when suggesting new document
structures. The next milestone should be WG last call on
base in May, so if your suggestion is likely to cause that
date to slip, I guess it'd be good to include a justification
for that.
Cheers,
Stephen.
[1] http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dkim-charter.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html