ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

2006-03-25 13:12:10
How does this address my concern? This looks like my current receiver
would fail with the new signature format. That's not backward compatable.

All verifiers already have to change, to support SHA-256.

Barry

--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology  
(leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html