ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

2006-03-26 15:35:30
However we have so far preserved the ability of a pre-IETF signer to work with a post-IETF DKIM verifier. (So, Barry's statement is true,
> but I'm not sure it addressed the concern.

I believe my text, or a reasonable variant of it (modulo Paul's concerns, for instance) preserves this ability. Do you disagree? Perhaps, if you do, changing a SHOULD to a MUST would fix that?

Barry

--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology  
(leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html