Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 6:57 AM -0800 3/28/06, Michael Thomas wrote:
So I'll ask: is there anybody out there who thinks that the current
set of mechanisms in -allman-01 is insufficient and/or wrong for dealing
with this problem?
Yes (insufficient). The current proposal for allowing signers to only
have to compute the hash once for large message bodies that will be sent
out numerous times (such as in a mailing list) seems like an improvement.
Arrgh! Don't cross the threads! (Wasn't that in ghostbusters or
something:-)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html