Stephen Farrell wrote:
Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 6:57 AM -0800 3/28/06, Michael Thomas wrote:
So I'll ask: is there anybody out there who thinks that the current
set of mechanisms in -allman-01 is insufficient and/or wrong for dealing
with this problem?
Yes (insufficient). The current proposal for allowing signers to only
have to compute the hash once for large message bodies that will be
sent out numerous times (such as in a mailing list) seems like an
improvement.
Arrgh! Don't cross the threads! (Wasn't that in ghostbusters or
something:-)
I should explain I guess (got an offlist mail implying so anyway).
I interpreted Mike's posting as being about issue #1224 and not
being about #1193. Mike - do correct me if I'm wrong there.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html