On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:20:20 -0000, Tony Hansen <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'd like to see either one of these two statements added to the end of
section 3.4.3:
a) As a limiting case, an empty message body would be canonicalized
into a single CRLF pair.
b) An empty message body should be canonicalized into an empty string.
But isn't even the simple canonicalization then supposed to discard blank
lines at the end of the message, thus rendering those two the same?
Or what am I missing?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html