You're missing this statement:
"In more formal terms, the "simple" body canonicalization algorithm
converts "0*CRLF" at the end of the body to a single "CRLF"."
This states *how*
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
Charles Lindsey wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:20:20 -0000, Tony Hansen <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I'd like to see either one of these two statements added to the end of
section 3.4.3:
a) As a limiting case, an empty message body would be canonicalized
into a single CRLF pair.
b) An empty message body should be canonicalized into an empty
string.
But isn't even the simple canonicalization then supposed to discard
blank lines at the end of the message, thus rendering those two the same?
Or what am I missing?
--Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own
thing------------------------
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html