ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call

2007-05-17 10:48:59
On Thu, 17 May 2007, John C Klensin wrote:

Is this construction dangerous if used in inappropriate
contexts?  Sure.  Does that justify a warning note to the
unwary?  Probably.  Is it possible to implement other things and
call them by the same name (i.e., create a non-conforming
implementation)?  Of course.  Should that invalidate the
definition?  Not if we want to have anything left if the
principle were applied broadly.

+1

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
ROCKALL: SOUTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8, INCREASING SEVERE GALE 9, PERHAPS STORM 10
LATER. VERY ROUGH OR HIGH. SHOWERS. GOOD.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>