On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:58:52 +0100, Hector Santos <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
wrote:
The DKIM "Policies Concept" design MUST include a "I NEVER SIGN" or "NO
SIGNATURE" domain expectation concept as a requirement. This is a
fundamental protection for the otherwise unprotected DKIM-BASE signature
process and now that we are discussing wild cards and sub-domains, this
no-signature idea becomes even more prevalent.
+1 (assuming s/I NEVER SIGN/NO-MAIL/)
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html