Would it help the discussion if large deployers of DKIM expressed their
opinions on nomail? (Again, they could express their opinions and this
item could still be held for later.)
If nomail is indeed the most useful SSP-ish assertion, which I agree
it is, it might make sense for people who care about it to go work on
moving MX . (or some other pure nomail approach) along the standards
track rather than getting entangled in SSP.
One killer problem of putting nomail into SSP is that if example.com
publishes a nomail SSP, and sends signed mail, there is no agreement
at all here on which one you believe.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html