Mark Delany wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
A better question is how many domains will move signing into production
without the testing flag, then fix the inevitable issues.
Given that most protocols do not have a 'testing' flag -- and they
manage to move into production quite nicely -- a different question
might be why such a flag is needed...
Ayup. I never had a good rationale for it either. I originally put it
into DK on the behest of others in spite of personal reservations.
Maybe this would be good motivation to get to draft standard.
Mike, who never understood either
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html