Re: [ietf-dkim] Responsibility vs. Validity

Jon Callas wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The thing I find most disturbing is that I perceive an effort to turn  
> DKIM into a user-level signing system. This is not the intent of DKIM.
+1. I can't see that working well or even practical.


--
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html